Monday, 16 July 2012

Alternate Best Actor 1965: Omar Sharif in Doctor Zhivago

Omar Sharif did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Dr. Yuri Andreyevich Zhivago the titular character of Doctor Zhivago.

Doctor Zhivago is the excellent follow up by David Lean to Lawrence of Arabia. This film certainly differs in many ways from that film the biggest being the lead character. In Lawrence of Arabia the main character of T.E. Lawrence absolutely controlled the film, and as made the world notice his extraordinary measures. Doctor Zhivago on the other hand though is not a particularly active individual being a man who is most acted upon. He does not change the course of Russia, he in fact can barely control his own existence and is forced to move along with the changes of Russia. Also I suppose I should note that unlike O'Toole Sharif was not nominated for his leading role despite winning the golden globe.

Omar Sharif has a difficult task which is to carry this over three hour long epic on his shoulders even with his character being only the most common man at times. Sharif really takes this fact in stride though, and does not try to be anything more than what Zhivago should be. Funny enough originally Peter O'Toole was the first choice to portray Zhivago, and the fact that O'Toole turned it down was certainly a good thing. One characteristic that seems clear in Zhivago is meekness, and if there is one thing that Peter O'Toole most certainly is not is meek. Sharif though never tries to be more than what Zhivago should be and makes the most of his character despite being such a meek man.

Omar Sharif gives a very understated performance in the lead role that stresses the fact that Zhivago is not an extraordinary man by any measure. Rather just a man trying to live his life particularly early on in the film as he goes through what is expected of him marrying the woman he was posed to marrying finding a properly supportive profession as a doctor, even though he desires to be remembered as a poet, and watching all the events around him only as an observer. Sharif is very good at being this average man because he so honestly portrays the part. He does not try to fancy up what does not need to be, there is a life in this man, but only really a life that desires to live not much more than that.

Sharif effectively reflects a successful, but in many ways, average man when it comes to viewing the changes in Russia that come from the revolution. Sharif shows his reactions, at least at first, to be mostly astonishment at what is going on around as Yuri's interest never really is the revolution at hand. He just is a bystander and he only reacts to the various occurrences taking place in Russia never once taking action to implement any sort of change. When he faced with losing most of his house to revolutionary changes he acts almost slight bemusement at the idea, Sharif showing that Yuri is quite good in taking it in stride at first. The changes do slowly wear on him such as when the state takes more and more of him.

Sharif is good in showing the way that even a man who tries to take things for the best even at the worst can't  deal with the suffering caused by all of the traumatic events in Russia. Sharif still does not show that Yuri changes his nature by any means he is still he same modest man, but there is a growing sadness is in performance. It is all very low key and mostly involves small quiet gestures by Sharif, but he is quite effective as showing the emotions of a sane man in an insane world. For example his scene with Tom Courtenay's Strelnikov, Courtenay of course is electrifying in the scene with his intense depiction of the dehumanization of a man, but Sharif is just as important in showing the completely human and heartbreaking reaction as he shows Yuri's sadness and disbelief over the change in the man.

Of course I should mention that a pivotal part of the film is the central love story between Yuri and Laura (Julie Christie). Now Sharif here is quite excellent as he builds up the love of Yuri, and again Sharif does not overplay this. Early in the film he is good as we see him notice her, and Sharif conveys an unshakable feeling for the woman who Yuri does not even know who she is. Of course they do meet, and Sharif is very good in showing the love that slowly grows with him. He never comes out with it obviously, and at first they do not act upon since they are both married. Even when they finally do have an affair Sharif still stays true to the character, and leaves much unsaid. Sharif and Christie make their relationship something special because both stay subtle and make it far more truthful than if they had conveyed the emotions in a broader fashion.

It would have been very easy for many actors to try and portray the character in a different more constantly active, and could frankly have been trying to steal scenes away from the likes of Rod Steiger and Tom Courtenay. That would have been the wrong approach though. In one scene in the film Zhivago states that he would rather just live life rather than try to be the surgeon for the world, and that is very much Sharif's portrayal. He does not try to control any scene of the film with his performance, but rather he stands firm in his realistic portrayal of an ordinary man in an extraordinary situation. This really is not the usual performance for an epic, but Sharif makes the most of his character and successfully carries the film.


RatedRStar said...

Unfortunately I didnt really sympathise that much with Sharifs character, I felt more drawn and sorry for Courtenays character, especially when Sharif is told that Pasha/Strelnikov is dead, I felt a loss when that happened.

RatedRStar said...

I still thought he was great =D, I just thought Courtenay was the one I felt more sorry for.

dinasztie said...

I think his casting was a Disaster with capital D. I guess you didn't read the book, but he's totally wrong for the real Zhivago. He somehow doesn't seem to be a blond Russian guy.

Otherwise, Sharif was excellent in this part, but he's still not the Zhivago of the book. But really, the movie doesn't have that much to do with the book anyway. If I think about them separately, Sharif is indeed great.

dshultz said...

Fantastic performance. I was afeared that you would not like him, but I am quite glad that you did.

Bailey Posey said...

Listen Louis, I am intrigued by how you can identify an actors performance explaining to us why they got that nomination, describing to us in detail whether they deserved the nomination/win or not. I have been viewing your blog for a while, I would say 11 to 9 months. I have just made an account here today. The reason why is because I ask for a request. I just saw Moonrise Kingom during the afternoon of today, one reason is because I have heard from critics that it was beautifully acted by the ensemble. I noticed a bit of what made a few of their performances so exhilarating , but the rest it was hard to understand. What I ask from you is if you've seen it or it's still being played in a theater near you if you could see it and explain what made the ensembles performances so fantastic. If you don't wish to post it on your blog since the 85th Academy Awards hasn't happened yet, then please message me the details. Like I said I'm new to blogspot so if you can't message me, try contacting me at Facebook or where ever. For the actresses, ask your friend who gives the details on an actress's performances to do the same thing. Thank you very much.

Louis Morgan said...

I'd be happy to do that actually, but unfortunately I have not seen the film.

Anonymous said...

What do you think about using meta description on blog posts?
I read told me to not bother with them a while a go
as they are no use anymore
Do you participate in any social sites

Stop by my blog post ... seo practice